Une partie du contenu de cette page s’affiche en anglais car la traduction française n’est pas encore prête. Le texte français sera affiché dès qu’il sera prêt. Nous vous prions de nous excuser pour cette situation peu satisfaisante mais nous sommes obligés de procéder ainsi pour éviter les difficultés techniques qui existent lorsque les utilisateurs passent du site anglais au site français de notre site web alors que nous sommes en train de créer et d’afficher de nouveaux documents. N’hésitez pas à nous contacter si vous avez besoin d’aide.

Mesure de l’économie sociale

INTRODUCTION

Le domaine de la responsabilité, de la vérification et de la remise de rapports en matière sociale et éthique attire de plus en plus l’attention, tant de la part des praticiens qui oeuvrent dans des organismes d’économie sociale que de celle des chercheurs. Il existe de nombreuses raisons qui font qu’un organisme souhaite se lancer dans la responsabilité, la vérification et la remise de rapports en matière sociale et éthique. Les quatre plus importantes sont les suivantes : (1) pour valoriser l’aspect « social » et le rendre visible (ceci est utile pour les besoins internes des organismes, tels que les évaluations régulières de la progression du travail concernant les engagements pris, ou pour la planification stratégique); (2) pour répondre aux demandes (et parfois aux exigences légales) de responsabilité vis-à-vis des agences externes telles que celles qui fournissent des fonds; (3) pour fournir des rapports plus complets aux membres et/ou aux parties prenantes sur le rendement de l’organisme; (4) pour utiliser dans les domaines du choix de marque/marketing, de la gestion des risques et/ou de la formation pédagogique et du recrutement. Quant un organisme se lance dans des activités de responsabilité, de vérification et de remise de rapports en matière sociale et éthique, il faut que cet organisme articule clairement ses priorités sociales, mette au point des mesures pour contrôler les résultats et identifier les insuffisances relatives à ces priorités, tienne des comptes (comptes sociaux), vérifie ces comptes et présente des rapports sur ces comptes. Les décisions relatives aux priorités, aux mesures et à la tenue de comptes indiquent que l’organisme est prêt à s’engager dans un processus d’évaluation et qu’il ne s’intéresse pas uniquement aux résultats obtenus. Cela rejoint le domaine de la recherche en matière d’évaluation (Brown 2002). Cette section présente un tableau général sur ce sujet.

 

Despite widespread assumptions about business priorities being economic and not social, this “conceptual firewall”, dividing the world into social and economic realms, is being challenged by new ways of thinking about business (Bornstein, 2007: x). Current interest in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is one manifestation of this shift in our thinking, and raises important questions about measurement and the verification of results. Challenging the bifurcation of the social and the business is at the core of the Social Economy, where organizations have both social and economic priorities, conceptualized as interlocked and mutually reinforcing of the organization’s identity. CSR, socially responsible investing (SRI), environmental sustainability, income polarization, community development, concerns around valuing volunteerism - all these and more require attention to measurement and reporting.

It is widely recognized that traditional financial statements based on generally accepted accounting principles do not integrate social and financial performance measures (Hicks, Maddocks, Robb, & Webb, 2007; Mook, Quarter, & Richmond, 2007).  In part to fill that gap, many organizations now engage in some form of social and/or ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR).  At present most organizations engaged in SEAAR develop social reports through a process quite separate from its financial reporting.  This often results in the social accounting being a poor cousin of financial accounting. Further, there are no generally accepted principles for social performance information, nor indeed any agreement on whether standardization is desirable or not. However, there appears to be an emerging consensus that SEAAR is desirable and even necessary for any organizations committed to social goals.

A growing literature offers tools and frameworks for recording and assessing social performance (Mook et al., 2007; Brown, 2002; Gray, Dey, Owen, Evans, & Zadek, 1997; Svendsen, 1997; Whitehead and Avison, 1999).  The Conference Board of Canada (2007) identifies a number of standardized guidelines, some (e.g. the Global Reporting Initiative; Accountability 1000) now into the second and third generation. Standard indicators allow comparability across organizations but may not fully address the specific priorities of any one organization.  At present it is common for organizations to use a combination of standardized indicators and indicators particular to the organization. However, there are still relatively few organizations, and especially few small organizations, that keep comprehensive and ongoing social accounts.

References

Brown, Leslie (2002). “Credit Unions and Community: Three Case Studies from the Social Economy.” Économie et Solidarité 33 (1): 93-111.

Bornstein, David (2007). How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas.  New York: Oxford.

Conference Board of Canada (n.d.). CR Assessment Tools.  Retrieved Sept 15, 2007 from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/GCSR/CR_AT/codes_principles.htm  

Gray, Rob H, Colin R. Dey, Dave Owen, Richard Evans, & Simon Zadek (1997). Struggling with the Praxis of Social accounting: Stakeholders, Accountability, Audits and Procedures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 10 (3): 325-364.

Hicks, Elizabeth, Maddocks, John, Robb, Alan, & Webb, Tom (2007). Perspectives on the Accounting and Reporting Needs of Co-operatives and Co-operators:  A Preliminary Examination.  Paper presented at the CIRIEC conference, Victoria, October 2007.

Mook, Laurie, Jack Quarter & Betty Jane Richmond (2007). What Counts:  Social Accounting for Nonprofits and Cooperatives. Second Edition. London:  Sigel Press.

Svendsen, Ann (1997). The Stakeholder Strategy. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Whitehead, Paul C. & William R. Avison (1999). Comprehensive Evaluation: The Intersection of Impact Evaluation and Social Accounting. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 14 (1): 65-83.

 In June, 2008, L, Brown, E. Hicks, and L. Mook organized a roundtable Measuring What Counts in the Social Economy, at a conference organized by the Association for Nonprofit and Social Economy Research (ANSER). This roundtable session brought together interested persons from both the academy and from social economy organizations to explore measurement issues in the social economy. The roundtable set the stage to collectively develop a focus for moving the field forward in the Canadian context. The questions addressed at the session were as follows:

 A.     What are the measurement needs as identified by the SE sector?

B.      What aspects of the social are captured by measures currently in use and to what effect?

C.     Issues around stakeholder engagement in the process of SEAAR and subsequent organization change.

Below is the list of presentations at the ANSER roundtable session, with links to the presentations. Following the list of presenters, we have provided links to seven social economy organizations which do social accounting and reporting. These are by way of example only.

Presenters:

Ms. Denyse Guy – Executive Director, Ontario Co-operative Association - Measuring What Counts in the Social Economy (pdf, 2564.87KB)

Ms. Barbara Groome-Wynne – Graduate Student Assistant, Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown  -  Measurement Needs from the Perspective of Non-Profit Associations: An examination of funder requirements for social organizations on Prince Edward Island (pdf, 87.03KB)

Dr. Laurie Mook – Social Economy Centre, OISE, University of Toronto  -  One Approach to Social Accounting for Social Enterprises (pdf, 1300.67KB)

Dr. Leslie Brown and Ms. Elizabeth Hicks – Department of Sociology and Anthropology, & Department of Business, Tourism and Hospitality Management, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax -  Measuring what counts in the Social Economy Roundtable: What aspects of the social are captured by measures currently in use and to what effect? (pdf, 194.71KB)

Ms. Molly Hurd – Executive Director of Halifax Independent Schools, Halifax - The Halifax Independent School: Evolution of a Stakeholder Co-operative (pdf, 130.25KB)

EXAMPLES OF SOME CANADIAN SOCIAL ECONOMY ORGANIZATIONS WHICH HAVE PRODUCED REPORTS:

Caisse Alterna

“Nous sommes fiers d’être la première « caisse populaire » établie à l’extérieur du Québec. Depuis nos débuts en 1908, c’est l’esprit d’effort commun, d’entraide et d’harmonie qui a motivé nos fondateurs à persévérer dans la réalisation de leur vision.”

“À la Caisse Alterna, nous mesurons nos succès de plusieurs manières. Certaines mesures sont prises sans formalité, telles les observations de nos sociétaires, la participation à l’assemblée générale annuelle et notre capacité d’appuyer financièrement des organisations communautaires. Évidemment, notre rendement financier est une mesure d’importance, ainsi que notre bilan social.”

Rapport de responsabilité 2008-2009

Rapport communautaire 2010

Sommaire annuel 2010

Co-operators

« Le Groupe Co-operators limitée (GCL) est une coopérative de propriété entièrement canadienne ayant plus de 65 ans d’histoire. Nos membres-propriétaires regroupent des coopératives, des caisses d’épargne et de crédit ainsi que des organisations gérées en fonction de principes coopératifs. »

« Nos décisions opérationnelles sont guidées par nos principes coopératifs; ainsi, l’équilibre se crée entre notre besoin de rentabilité et les besoins de nos membres-propriétaires et leurs collectivités. Parce qu’elle accorde la priorité aux gens et qu’elle fonde ses décisions opérationnelles sur des objectifs à long terme, Co-operators se distingue de façon marquée de la plupart des compagnies d’assurances. »

Accueil

Bilans de développement durable 2010

Desjardins

« Nous sommes le plus important groupe financier coopératif au Canada. Nous offrons des services bancaires complets à près de 6 millions de membres et clients. Nous utilisons la force de la coopération non seulement pour procurer à nos membres une gamme étendue de services bancaires, mais aussi pour contribuer au développement économique et social de leur communauté. »

Accueil/Home

Rapport de responsabilité sociale et coopérative2009

Halifax Independent School

The Halifax Independent School, a cooperative since 1992 as Dalhousie Co-operative School, is comprised of a diverse group of educators, students and their families who are making every effort to achieve academic excellence through co-operative and theme-based study. To date, the report is internal and not available to the general public.  Check out their website!

NOTE: The Halifax Independent School is involved with Sub-node 5 research within the Social Economy and Sustainability Research Network. More information can be found on this research in the Sub-node 5 section of this website.

Planned Lifetime Advocacy Network (PLAN)

A non-profit organization which focuses on families who have a member with a disability. The goal of PLAN is “to ensure a safe and secure future for your relative with a disability and, in the process, to provide you and your loved ones with peace of mind”. PLAN offers a quarterly newsletter on their website, which informs the public of issues that are important to this group. One such issue is that of RDSP’s (Registered Disability Savings Plan) which will provide financial peace of mind to individuals and their families, helping with enrichment, sustainability and productivity.  Check out their website and information section, What is a Social Audit?

Sustainability Solutions Group

2007 Sustainability Assessment – Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG) Workers Cooperative. SSG “is a workers co-operative that nurtures and embodies a holistic understanding of sustainability and works with clients and collaborators to meaningfully integrate social, ecological and economic practices in their organizations and work.”

The SSG is in its third year of operation and reports the co-op’s activities and practices in order to improve performance. Information is then shared to clients, partners, collaborators and the general public.  Check out their website and The 2007 Sustainability Assessment

Vancity Savings Credit Union

Since 1994, this organization has worked with individuals and communities in British Columbia “to help them thrive and prosper.” Vancity achieves this goal by providing financial products and services to their members, then sharing up to thirty percent of the earned profits through member dividends and investments made within the community.  Check out their website and Accountability Reports

Thanks to summer 2008 Communications Assistant Sue Pottie for her assistance in developing this page in consultation with Leslie Brown.